Complex Networks of Desire: Mapping Community in Visual Arts Magazines Fireweed, Fuse, and Border/Lines

Felicity Tayler (felicity.tayler@utoronto.ca), University of Toronto, Canada and Tomasz Neugebauer (tomasz.neugebauer@concordia.ca), Concordia University Library

We present ongoing research using data visualization and complex network analysis to historicize the production of three periodicals: Fireweed, Fuse, and Border/Lines. Computational methods allow for the visualization of metadata describing these magazine issues as a complex network – but what do these visualizations reveal about real social relations involved in the production and circulation of these magazines?

Fireweed, Fuse, and Border/Lines emerged between 1976 and 1986 in Toronto, Canada, from a hotbed of lesbian and gay liberation, feminist and cultural race politics, thereby circulating in relation to transnational social, political and cultural movements (Butling and Rudy, Gonosko and Marcellus, Monk, Robertson). Whereas digital art historical scholarship often applies computational methods to the analysis of visual images (Zorich, Manovich), this paper instead applies complex network analysis to bibliographic metadata describing artist-led magazine publishing. We propose that there is a correlation between the magazine as a site of imagined community (as a discursive site where artistic scenes and poetic community are formed) (Allen, 12-17); and the complex networks visualized from metadata describing production teams and content of each printed issue (Knight, Long, Lincoln, Liu).

At this time, we have completed the data gathering stage. Prior to our initiative, Fireweed and Fuse were not digitized, nor were they comprehensively indexed on digital platforms. A complete data set was created using human cataloguers and a pre-existing metadata schema developed for the e-artexte open repository of publications on contemporary art. Border/Lines was previously digitized, and housed in an open journal repository. However, this online collection is not complete, further, it was not possible to extract the metadata from this platform in a consistent format . Contributor names and roles were indexed for each magazine issue (editor, author, translator, etc.). Many of the contributor names and roles already exist within the e-artexte authority files, and standard indexing protocols were expanded to include roles that are not usually recorded in the metadata (members of editorial committees, designers, typesetters, etc.).

Once indexed in e-artexte, the data became publicly accessible and exportable into various formats, including EPrints XML. A conversion to Graph GML files used Apache Pig Latin scripts (Neugebauer). The resulting Graph GML data was imported into Gephi.

To borrow an expression from Hoyt Long’s mapping of literary community, resulting graphs encourage a “sliding back and forth” between the macroscale of the generated graphs and the microscale of the discourse of the artistic and poetic communities represented (316).

A Multi Modal graph (Figure 1) maps relationships between individual magazine issues, contributors (writers, editors, and designers, etc.), artists as subjects of articles, and publishers. Edges were assigned a colour according to magazine title. Node size has been mapped to betweenness centrality, with a filter applied to a range higher than .01.

Lisa Steele and Clive Robertson feature prominently as contributors to Fuse magazine, with a high degree of betweenness centrality. This is not a surprise, as both authored multiple articles in the magazine, are founding editors and key figures in the Toronto artistic and activist scenes bridged through the magazine’s content (Robertson, Monk). More remarkable is the prominence of Lynne Fernie in the network, best known for later success as the director of documentary films addressing LGBTQ histories. Fernie’s high degree of betweenness centrality and position as a connector between the cluster of nodes surrounding Fuse magazine and Fireweed, provides a bridge between these two magazines as spaces that shared an impulse towards lesbian and feminist liberation. Poet and activist Dionne Brand, who works at the intersection of race and gender, also bridges Fuse and Fireweed. Cultural policy analyst Jody Berland, and gay activist and environmentalist Alexander Wilson bridge Fuse and Border/Lines. Feminist cultural historian Rosemary Donegan bridges all three discursive spaces .

A second graph, a Single Mode Contributor Projection will map relationships between individual contributors through their frequency of co-occurence in magazine issues. The graph will be filtered through edge weight, which represents co-occurrence in a minimal number of journal issues. We will colour the graph through community detection on this network of contributor relations using the modularity functionality in Gephi ( Blondel et al.).

We anticipate that contributors with a high betweenness centrality will emerge as catalysts for artistic community as it is represented by the discursive spaces of these magazines. Although some of these names may be iconic, “famous” artists and writers, other careers may not have had the same trajectory of visibility. Additional graphs will be generated by publication year to illustrate how the network structure and centrality measures changed over time.

Figure 1. A Multi Modal graph (Figure 1) maps relationships between contributors and issues of magazines with a high degree of betweenness centrality: Fuse (purple) previously titled, Centerfold (orange); Fireweed (green), and Border/Lines (blue).


Appendix A

Bibliography
  1. Allen, G. (2016). The Magazine. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  2. Butling, P. and Rudy, S. (2005). Writing in Our Time: Canada’s Radical Poetries in English (1957-2003). Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
  3. Gonosko, G. and Marcellus, K. (2005). Dead Downtown: Writing the Cultural Obituary of the Alternative Press. Topia, 14: 23-35.
  4. Knight, A. R. (2017). Putting them on the map: Mapping the Agents of the Colored Co-operative Publishing Company. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=665eb933117f4ed68f0535b4560b5744
  5. Lincoln, M. (2016). “Social Network Centralization Dynamics in Print Production in the Low Countries, 1550-1750” International Journal of Digital Art History 2: 134-157.
  6. Long, H. (2015). “Fog and Steel: Mapping Communities of Literary Translation in an Information Age” The Journal of Japanese Studies, 41(2): 281-316. DOI 10.1353/jjs.2015.0062
  7. Liu, A. (2012). “Friending the Humanities Knowledge Base: Exploring Bibliography as Social Network in RoSE.” NEH Office of Digital Humanities White Paper. https://rosedocumentation.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/rose-white-paper-as-submitted-to-neh.pdf
  8. Manovich, L. (2015). “Data Science and Digital Art History” International Journal of Digital Art History 1:12-34. DOI: 10.11588/dah.2015.1.21631
  9. Neugebauer, T. (2017). “EPrintsData2GML” Eprints Interest Group, 2017 International Conference on Open Repositories. https://github.com/photomedia/EPrintsData2GML
  10. Monk, P. (2016). Is Toronto Burning? Three Years in the Making (and Unmaking) of the Toronto Art Scene. Toronto: AGYU.
  11. Robertson, C. (2006). Policy Matters: Administrations of Art and Culture. Toronto: YYZ Books.
  12. Blondel, V.D. et al. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 10: 10008-10020. DOI 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  13. Zorich, D. (2012). “Transitioning to a Digital World: Art History, Its Research Centers, and Digital Scholarship,”  Kress Foundation . http://www.kressfoundation.org/news/Article.aspx?id=35338